You see, I don’t buy into the whole cockamamie idea that more so-called “gun control” results in less
crime. Just look at Europe. New York. California. New Jersey. These are states that have some of the
most “progressive” gun control laws, yet shootouts, gang violence and murder is daily content for their
evening news.

And then take a look at Vermont, Alaska, Montana, South Dakota and others. These states have some of
the most lax gun laws in the country, and per capita, they have lower amount of crime than any others
in the country.

Why? It’s because a violent criminal knows that if he is going to commit a crime, chances are much
greater that a potential “victim” won’t act very much like a victim. Simply put, a violent criminal
(read rapist or murderer) doesn’t wanna run the risk that his “victim” pull out a .38 special and put
five bullets in his chest and kills him!

My view of “gun control” is making sure you hit what you’re aiming at.

“Gun Control” advocates/liberals know good and well that they advocate against common sense and for
criminals. They say that they want to reduce the number of guns on the street in order to bring down
the crime levels, but what they fail to acknowledge (but DO fully understand) is that the only people you
restrict by laying on layer after layer of “gun control” are honest, law abiding citizens.

Make no mistake about it. These folks know that what they do increases crime, takes away your freedoms,
and prevents you from protecting your family. Their end-game is the complete disarmament of America.

Take for example these liberal whacko created so-called “gun free zones.” They’re better named “helpless
victim zones” because criminals know that fewer people (read law abiding citizens) in these areas go armed
and thus make a much better target/victim for their criminal intent. Gun-control liberals know darn well
that when a criminal wants to commit a violent crime that he doesn’t give a rip whether or not there’s a
stupid sign on the door saying “no guns allowed.” If he’s willing to commit murder, chances that he’d
rethink his whole “I’m gonna kill so and so” because “I might get convicted of the misdemeanor of carrying
a firearm into a gun free zone” are pretty stinkin slim.

So who is punished in these “gun free zones?” The honest, law abiding citizen. Like you. Like me. Like
your wife and kids. The criminal gets a free pass at these victims, because he doesn’t have to operate
under the same conditions we do. Honest, law-abiding citizens pay the penalty of the “gun control” crowd’s
evil intent and stupidity.

Enter the case of Jay R. Lewis. Lewis is an IRS call center employee that recently made headlines for

his case in Polk county. Lewis was going home one evening and passed a slow moving vehicle. The drivers
of the slow moving vehicle didn’t like this and sped up and smashed into his vehicle when Lewis was
trying to turn into his apartment complex.

Immediately the assailant (a convicted felon with more than 35 total convictions on his rap sheet!) and
his henchman jumped out of his vehicle, ran up to Lewis’ car and started beating on the windows. Lewis, a
former law enforcement officer, border patrol agent and security guard pulled a pistol from his pocket and
told them to back off. The assailants continued beating on his vehicle and shouting racial slurs at Lewis,
and Lewis pulled forward 200 yards to wait for the police to arrive.

Lewis got out of his car to survey the damage done to his vehicle, but didn’t want to leave the scene of
an accident knowing that police were on their way. The assailants, knowing that he was armed with a firearm,
closed the distance to him and circled around him, continuing their racial slurs and cursing.

Lewis shouted at them over a dozen times to either get on the ground or get back and that he had a firearm
and felt threatened for his safety and that he would shoot, and when his attackers continued to close in on
him to within only a few feet, Lewis took the steps necessary to defend himself and shot one of the attackers
in the chest.

Now, if you ask me, the burden of proof should be on the assailants and attackers, right? Lewis was on his
own apartment property at the point where he had to shoot the attacker, he had a permit to carry and yet when
it was all over, the police hauled HIM to jail!

At one point, Lewis’ cash surety requirement was 225,000 dollars, and being unable to afford bail, Lewis
spent over 100 days in jail. To add insult to injury, his landlord, knowing that he was in jail, put an
eviction notice on his door and ended up selling off his TV, his clothes, his books, his gun collection and
everything he owned.

In short, by defending his God given right to life, Lewis had his rights, his Constitutionally protected
rights, taken away from him. He was detained against his will. I don’t know about you, but I imagine that
something like that would be an unforgettable and major assault on someone’s liberty. I don’t know how to
convey what I’m trying to say in writing, but to take away someone’s constitutional right to life, liberty
and the pursuit of happiness is a gravely serious thing to do.

I think it’s sad that it had to cost someone so much just to be able to put a public face on such
a basic issue, but it certainly did raise public awareness of this issue.

So, I’m takin this fight to tin-horn dictator Mike Gronstal. From the floor of the Senate just yesterday, I
introduced Lewis to the body of the Senate and at the same time introduced a “discharge petition.” A dis-
charge petition, when signed by a majority of the senators, allows a bill to bypass the need to pass
through a committee and puts it right on the debate calendar.

Problem is, rabidly anti-freedom dictator senate majority leader Mike Gronstal (Liberal-Council Bluffs)
is notorious for his stance against freedom, the second amendment and your right to defend you and your
kids from violent criminals. He believes in gun control in it’s purest form, which is disarming the entire
population and making law abiding citizens into victims.

Gronstal already said yesterday that he “wouldn’t answer hypothetical questions on things that haven’t
happened yet.” Being the grand maestro of the puppet strings that he is, what Gronstaller is really saying
is that his little puppet in the Judiciary Committee, Chairman Gene Fraise (Liberal-Fort Madison), is going
to do as he’s told and kill the bill using the committee process. Then, even if we get enough pro-gun senators
to sign the discharge petition, Gronstal will point to the Judiciary committee and say “I’m not going to
call up that bill because it failed to pass through the committee process, and I’m choosing to honor the
time honored process and not call up that bill.”

What he’s really going to be saying is that he knows that the purpose of the discharge petition it to
circumvent the committee process for a need that must be addressed because of its importance. His public
allegiance to the “committee process” will give him the protection he needs in his district, and it’ll
protect the little puppets on his strings from being forced to be held accountable for standing up for
the lives and freedoms of honest, law abiding potential victims.

It’s a shame, really. A shame to the constituents he serves, the constituents his puppets serve, and a
shame to law abiding citizens like Jay Lewis.

 But I’m not one to back down from a fight. Iowa gun owners across the state need to demand that their
Senator comes on over to my desk and signs the discharge petition. To date, all 24 Republican Senators have
signed the petition, and now we only need 2 Democrat pro-gun senators to sign it to be able to demand that
our Dictator Gronstal bring up the Stand Your Ground bill for an up or down vote.

To be able to stay here and continue fighting for you, I need to be able to fund my campaign. My campaign
needs resources to be able to contact and identify as many voters in my district as possible, because guys
like me are always targeted by big labor, tax and spend, pro-abort and anti-second Amendment thugs.

Please rush me your most generous donation of $35, $50, $100, $250 or even $500. With your support, I’ll
be able to start now in making sure that we don’t lose conservative seats in the Iowa Senate. With Gronstal
and his radical liberals going all out in this election to make sure that their Obama-topped election ticket
doesn’t come to a grinding halt in the upcoming elections, you can be sure that they’ll be looking forward
to the next set of elections for revenge, and staunch, vocal conservatives like me who say it like it is
will be at the top of their list.

Like the ole’ verse goes, “Our Motto Is Resistance to the Tyrants Never Yield.” You can rest assured that
I’ll never yield to tyranny. I hope I can count on you for your most generous contribution today.

Sincerely,

State Senator Kent Sorenson
Serving Warren, Madison and SE Dallas Counties

P.S. Honest, law-abiding people like Ray Lewis shouldn’t have to bear the burden of proof when it comes to
their God given right to life and the defense of it. It’s truly a shame that events like this are needed to
shed light on a legitimate problem with our laws.

I support the Stand Your Ground legislation that was passed in the Iowa House, and I know that Democrats
like Gronstal will do everything in their power to kill this legislation to make sure that honest, peaceful
folks like you and me are put in harm’s way. Please contact your State Senator TODAY and tell them to sign
my discharge petition.

It takes guys like me on the inside to continue holding the liberals’ feet to the fire, and in order to do
that I need to have your support. Please donate $35, $50, $100, $250, $500 or whatever you can afford to my
campaign today! 

someone, and having a specific day for it really helps some folks (like me) to remember to do just that. If it
weren’t for my wife and kids, I’m sure I’d be a wholly different person, and I’m thankful for my loved ones.

Valentines Day is named after St. Valentinus. There were several of them, as a matter of fact, and they were
from different areas in Europe and Africa, but the common theme amongst them was that they were martyred for
their faith in God. I hope and pray that we never lose our religious freedom on this side of the pond because
we let our guards down and let tyranny raise his ugly head.

And speaking of martyrdom, like ole’ Benjamin Franklin said, there’s two things for sure in this world, and
that’s death and taxes. But here in the Iowa Senate, they tend to want to use the one till you get the other,
if you know what I mean. And simply being dead doesn’t get you a free pass anymore, either!

The issue sitting on the hot button seems to be this whole proposed gas tax increase. Some folks seem to think
that our roads and highways are in utter disrepair, and that the way to deal with these “critical needs” is to
raise taxes on the gas that you put in your car by the paltry sum of ten cents per gallon.

Now, as a state senator who campaigned and won his election by promising no new taxes, the thought of trying
to justify to you why I have to break my promise is about as appealing to me as getting a root canal. And my
next thought is how someone can justify INCREASING taxes when our economy is in the condition it is? My thought
is that something like this would be detrimental to a recovering economy, wouldn’t you? Should we raise our taxes
on fuel by ten cents a gallon? How about eight? Should conservatives be raising taxes period? Should we pursue
other solutions, such as trimming the fat in the existing budget and use our existing revenue? Has anything changed
since the 2010 elections? Is the economy recovered so much that we can certainly afford such an increase in taxes
right now? Send me an email and tell me what you think!

On the surface, I’d say not. And when you stop to think about it, who would bear the brunt of this increased
tax? The way I figure, it’ll hurt the lower income families the most. If a guy makes $500 a week and has to pay
an additional two or three bucks a week to fill up his pickup, that adds up to a couple hundred bucks in new
taxes every year. NEW, INCREASED TAXES.

I don’t know about you, but with times the way they are, a couple hundred bucks can mean a heck of a lot to a
housewife trying to make ends meet with less than she needs. Or a couple hundred bucks could mean a nice getaway
with your honey over Valentines Day.

Personally, I think the idea should be hauled out with the rest of the trash from the cafeteria at the capitol, and
certainly NOT put in the recycling bin. 

There’s a couple of other issues that the Senate is facing right now as well. Let’s say you owned a company
which manufactured agricultural equipment that you sold through a sales team. And let’s say your business is
growing and that you’ve decided that your sales team needs to be able to market and sell your equipment to pork
producers, and to do that you need to hire a salesperson for that position.

In order to sell more pieces of equipment to pork producers, you decided that you would like a prospective
salesperson to have a good work ethic, previous pork producing experience and of course, salesmanship. It’s ideal,
right?

Now, we all know that there are some lines that can’t be crossed when hiring employees such as race, religion,
national origin, age, etc. But you will have standards, and probably wouldn’t get all excited about someone who
got fired a year ago from their job selling baby clothes at a store in the mall, right? You’re looking for just
the right person!

Never fear, Senate Democrats are here to help! In what would likely result in an explosion of lawsuits in Iowa,
Senate Democrats are trying to equate the failure to hire an unemployed person with racial discrimination. Eleven
Democratic senators have introduced a bill, Senate File 2028, which prohibits employment discrimination based on
an individual’s status as unemployed, meaning someone without a job, available for work, and searching.

This bill would specifically prevent an employer from advertising for positions but stating that the unemployed
are disqualified from applying, failing or refusing to consider someone for a job because the person is unemployed,
or directing an employment agency to do any of the above. The bill allows for actual damages, court costs,
attorney fees, and fines for violations of the advertising prohibitions. In addition, the bill calls for the Iowa
Civil Rights Commission to administer the law, which could turn into nightmare in caseload work for the Commission.

This is what it boils down to. Democrat leadership practiced unsustainable spending policies for years. Through
the bully pulpit of their senate and former house and governor’s office majorities, they increased spending,
restricted small business’ ability to make their own decisions, increased regulation and jacked up taxes.

Now they think it’s a good idea to further restrict a job creator’s ability to hire whom he thinks is the best
person to get the job done and successfully grow his or her business!

Worse, the so called “plaintiff” only needs to do to get a few general “facts” established, like the fact that
they are unemployed and are looking for work and were rejected by so and so, and all of a sudden the burden of
proof is on the “employer.” We’re talking retaining legal counsel, additional costs and headache and possible
damages and fines!

You know, I couldn’t dream this stuff up if I was paid to do it. But more important that the surface ridicule,
it begs the question of whether or not status of employment is an immutable characteristic like race, religion or
nationality!

Hardly! With all the rules and regulations these folks want to cram down our throats, you’d almost have to be
insane to TRY to grow your business and create jobs. And from what I’ve heard in talking with business owners and
job creators, it can truly be a nightmare.

It’s regulatory and litigation burdens just like these that make Iowa’s economy suffer. Just last week I heard
about a company called Bel Brands USA. Bel Brands USA had narrowed its search for the placement of a new $100
million dollar cheese factory down to Iowa and South Dakota. They were expected to employ 400 people and have an
annual $500 million economic impact on their state of choosing, and they chose South Dakota!

So why did Iowa lose out on such a great opportunity? You don’t have to guess, folks. In announcing their
decision to locate the new facility in South Dakota, Bel Brands USA stated the state’s “pro-business” environment
as one of the major reasons. With no corporate income tax, it’s hard to argue against their decision.

You and I know that two of the key components in a company’s decision-making process are what a state’s
long-term tax and regulatory implications will be on the business. Problem is, the only idea liberal bully puppet
masters like Mike Gronstal can come up with to turn our economy around is just more of the same ole’ “tax and
spend” and “lets grow the size of government even more” ideas that got us where we are today!

Sincerely,

State Senator Kent Sorenson
Serving Warren, Madison and SE Dallas Counties

You’ve all heard what comes next. The words of our freedom
loving Founding Father Patrick Henry’s famous speech are
etched into the hearts and minds of every school child.

“I know not what course others may take; but as for me,
give me liberty or give me death!”

Sounds good, doesn’t it? It sure makes a guy feel
patriotic. Heck, when I think about it, I like to fancy I’d
be right there with him, fearlessly laying my life on the
line to throw off the tyranny of the king.

Because that’s exactly what they were doing. When Patrick
Henry said those words, he wasn’t just giving a feel-good
speech at a rally on the statehouse steps. The very words
he uttered had extremely real consequences, ones that would
endanger the lives of his friends, family and loved ones.

Guys like him and the rest of the signers of the Declaration
all knew this. They knew the line they crossed couldn’t be
reversed and that it might cost them their lives.

But they did it anyway.

They did it because they looked into the future and knew if
they didn’t stake their ground that they, their kids, their
grandkids, even you and I, would lose it all.

So would we do the same? I’d like to think so. But it’s lucky
for folks like you and me that we aren’t there yet. Our
“kings” aren’t openly marching troops in the streets
enforcing their tyrannical laws.

Yet.

But that doesn’t mean that we don’t have tyranny. To borrow
a line from one of my favorite movies, we’ve simply traded
one tyrant 3 thousand miles away for thousands of tyrants
one mile away.

Here in Iowa, the leader of our own little tyrant brigade
is found in the liberal democrat senate majority leader Mike
Gronstal.

Nationally, we’ve got government gone wild with their “big
brother” mentality. Cyber monitoring. Attempts to regulate
the Internet. Automated traffic enforcement. Electronic
eavesdropping. Groping stations at airports. The list of
things we need to be “safe” in this country gets bigger and
bigger every day.

And you don’t have to go visit a big city out east or west
anymore to get treated like a criminal, either. It’s happening
right now to Iowans, folks just like you and me.

A friend of mine told me just the other day that she and her
teenage daughter had gone through a nightmare when she
refused to be treated like a criminal and let the TSA thugs
run her and her daughter through their x-ray scanners.

You probably have heard about the scanners I’m talking about.

You know, the ones that provide naked pictures of the victims
to the TSA agents working the counter? The ones that clearly
violate the fourth amendment to the Constitution, which
states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons,
houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches
and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall
issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or
affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be
searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

Not only that, but a constituent of mine from Earlham, IA,
had the same experience where she was treated like a criminal
for refusing to be treated like one! Deciding to do a little
digging, I tragically found out that being groped and molested
isn’t a very uncommon thing anymore when it comes to traveling.

I decided that I will no longer stand idly by. I’m going to do
everything I can to see that these attacks on our rights are
ended.

I’m drafting legislation immediately that will outright ban
these actions that infringe upon our constitutional rights and
decency.

The bill is still in drafting, and it’s got a ways to go
before I would consider it able to be effective, but I’m here
to tell you that I’m going to be introducing the bill THIS
SESSION, and I’ll be fighting tooth and nail to get these
knuckleheads up here to pass this legislation.

Sure, some of you might think that these “safety measures”
are necessary for this day and age, but I disagree. If we have
to be treated like criminals to ensure our own safety, we’ve
lost the right to call this a free country, and I for one am
not willing to do that.

Right now, you and I have the chance to avoid what our
Founding Fathers had to sacrifice. We can still hold our
elected officials responsible because they ARE elected, and
we can still kick them out through peaceful means.

The Founding Fathers had come to a point where efforts at
diplomacy and politeness had failed. We aren’t at that
point. There are a few things we can do to take this country
back.

First, I’d like every single one of you to call or email your
elected legislators and demand that they support this good
legislation. Tell them that when this bill gets introduced that
they should co-sponsor it and do everything they can to bring it
to the floor for a clean vote. Tell them that you’ll be more
than happy to vote against them in the next election.

Next, please click here to chip in $50, $35, $20 or whatever
you can afford to my campaign. When it comes to fighting
for our rights, there’s a shortage of folks here in Des Moines
who are willing to walk the walk instead of just talking the talk.

With your generous support, I’ll be able to support fighters like
me who want to run for the state legislature. There’s a few of
them out there, believe it or not, and with the help of folks like
you we’ll be ready, willing and able to stand against the
onslaught of those who wield “chains and slavery.”

Sincerely,

State Senator Kent Sorenson
Serving Warren, Madison and SE Dallas Counties

P.S. The Founding Fathers knew that life, liberty and peace are
jeopardized when we trade them for “safety.”

Our “big brother government” has gotten out of hand. Their
assault on our liberties in the name of keeping us “safe” has
gone too far, and the TSA’s naked scanners and invasive personal
pat downs are a prime example of that.

I’m drafting a bill that I’ll introduce this year that forces
the TSA to keep their hands and eyes to themselves. Click here to
find out who your legislators are, and call or email them TODAY
and demand that they support my bill that stops this assault on
our rights.

And please chip in $50, 35, $20 or whatever you can afford to my
Senate campaign so that I can help elect fellow liberty minded
candidates to the Iowa Legislature. With your generous support,
we’ll have a united front that’s ready, willing and able to fight
back when they come after us with guns blazing.

Like I’ve said before, and I’ll say again (and again), they removed the 40-year-old procedural rules that would’ve allowed me to force votes on good legislation!

So not much happens here in the Senate. The liberal majority party has ignored their constituents’ wishes all session long and successfully gutted every bill that conservatives like me in the Senate have brought forward.

And they have a nasty habit of mutilating bills that passed through the House of Representatives as well.

It boils down to a good ole’ fashion arrogant rejection of the voter’s demands in November!

It’s such a waste that I thought I’d run some rough numbers for you. Senators and their clerks ALONE have a daily total cost of roughly $21,000.  That’s for 50 senators and their clerks.

But it gets worse. The Senate Majority party’s refusal to yield to the demands of the people they’re supposed to serve in effect wastes the time of the House of Representatives as well.

So take that Senate number, multiply it by 2 for the 100 House Representatives, add it to the Senate total, and it seems that Iowa taxpayers are footing a bill of roughly $63,000 a day for legislators and their clerks ALONE.

This doesn’t include:

-        The Legislative Services Agency employees that service the legislators and help draft legislation, bills and amendments.

-        The caucus staff for both parties in both chambers.

-        The time the pages in both chambers put in.

-        The Secretary of the Senate and the administrative staff, AND their House counterpart.

-        The cafeteria staff.

-        The laptops that all 150 legislators have.

-        The paper and printers that we use each day.

-        The building maintenance staff…

…and the list goes on!

You know, I don’t have the exact numbers, but I wouldn’t be at all surprised if we spend over $200,000 a day at the capitol. Multiply that by a 110 day legislative session and Iowans are on the losing end of a whopping total of $22 million bucks.

And for what? Do we elect our representatives so that an elite few can ignore, reject and refuse the will of the people?

Americans have been here before. I think a major part of our American heritage is defined by our willingness to throw out the whole “divine right of kings” mentality. We fought a successful war against the world’s greatest military so that we could implement a constitutional republic, where those in office derived their governance from the consent of the governed.

But it looks to me like King George III is alive and well in ultra-left-wing liberals like Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal. We exist to serve the elite like Gronstal, and the big spending, big taxing policies that they like to promulgate have failed in history and will always fail in the future.

Our hemorrhaging middle class is clear and present evidence of this fact.

Our unemployed are the reality of this fact.

Our faltering economy and stagnant small business climate are evidence that this is only going to get worse.

Remember in the next elections that the Senate majority only continued their assault on the middle class that they began years ago. Because like our Founding Fathers realized, we need to remove those that threaten our livelihood from office.

And we’re lucky enough not to have to take up arms to do so, like our Founding Fathers. We only need to take up a pencil at the next elections.

As always please do hesitate to contact me with you issues and concerns.

Senator Kent Sorenson

For example, HF 290 (formerly SF 78) allows a motorcycle with added stabilizing wheels in the back to remain classified as a motorcycle instead of being reclassified as an automobile. This lets motorcycle owners avoid the added fees that such modifications create. It passed with ease and was sent on to the Governor’s desk because it’s just plain ole’ common sense.

Senate File 471, known as the Red Tape Commission bill, requires each state agency to review all of its administrative rules on a five-year cycle, with the goal being the removal of outdated and unnecessary rules. It too passed out of the Senate and went on to the House because it’s downright unfashionable in our current economic climate to be touting more rules and restriction that are disconnected from reality.

And one other bill that just made sense to everybody was the Stolen Valor Act that made it illegal for a person to impersonate a decorated military veteran with the intent to deceive another person for the purpose of monetary gain.  It passed 48-0, with two senators excused for health reasons.

You seeing what I’m seeing? One would think so. For brief moments it seems like common sense became contagious.

But then we get another healthy slap in the face in the form of the Small Business Health Care Tax Credit bill.

This bill provides an Iowa refundable tax credit against income tax liability equal to 25 percent of the new federal Small Business Health Care Tax Credit for Iowa domicile employers with ten or fewer full time employees. The Iowa credit is refundable, and the federal tax credit gives a tax credit to certain small employers that provide health care coverage to their employees.

Sounds good, and it passed with a vote of 48-0, but the untold story is what goes unnoticed!

You see, an amendment to the bill that would allow the Iowa credit (for businesses that employ up to ten full time employees) to apply to any small businesses that qualifies for the federal credit (which allows for businesses that employ up to 25 full time employees) was voted down along party lines!

So if I get this right, the federal government thinks we should give this tax credit to businesses that employ up to 25 full time employees, but the big spending, big taxing majority party in the Senate believes the state of Iowa should restrict that credit to only those who employ up to ten people?

Don’t get me wrong here, small businesses who employ up to ten people deserve every single tax break they can get!

But if I were a small business that employed ten people and was thinking about expanding my production abilities and hiring more employees, where is my incentive now? The moment I’d go from ten employees to 11, I’d lose those tax credits!

And the flip side is also true. Because who knows, if someone has 11 employees and only has to fire one to qualify for those tax credits, that just might be enough to let an employee go.

So while this indeed does give a tax break to some small businesses, it seems to be a dis-incentive to others (a net-neutralizing effect), and I know of several small businesses right now that could certainly use that tax break that the federal government already agrees upon.

So the dog and pony show (read: CIRCUS) rolls on.

But don’t be fooled, because it’s not entertaining. This stuff affects people’s lives. It affects their paychecks, and it affects their standard of living.

What the big-tax-and-spenders in control of the Senate are really doing is continuing the debacle of the last several years in the hopes that they can use votes like the small business health care tax vote to make themselves look small business friendly while at the same time try to blame conservatives like me for not doing anything to ease the strain on the economy they created.

It isn’t true, and we won’t forget.

Feel free to give me your input by writing to kent.sorenson@legis.state.ia.us, and I appreciate hearing from you

Sincerly,

Senator Kent Sorenson

Instead of saving you and me the $500 million we so greatly need, it now only saves a whopping $10 million over the next three years.

And instead of setting aside $327 million for tax relief, the liberal Democrat Senate version sets aside a whopping $0.

All of that waiting, all of that Gron-stalling and delay, was for nothing. The clear message that taxpayers sent back on November 2 was that Iowans wanted real representation, lower taxes, lower spending and less government.

So you and I, the Iowa economy and Iowa workers continue to foot the bill.

Now don’t get me wrong, I’m all for saving money. But the $10 million dollar token the liberal leader of the senate forced down our throats is more of an insult than substantive savings.

Senate conservatives offered amendment after amendment to the liberal chokehold on taxpayers but to no avail.  It was a party line vote every time at 26-24.

But have no fear! The liberal Democrats did let us debate a bill about raccoon hunting!

(For those of you needing a refresher, the reason I say that they “let us debate” is because liberal Majority Leader, Mike Gronstal from Council Bluffs controls the Senate Calendar, the passage of legislation through committees, and decides if we should be allowed to vote on any particular legislation and ultimately determines the outcome of any potential legislation IF he decides to let it come to the floor.)

So for those of you who cast your vote on November 2, 2010, because you were mad that you couldn’t take your minor child raccoon hunting with you without them having a license, I’d like you to know that I voted FOR repealing that requirement.

You can now take your minor child raccoon hunting with you and they don’t need a license.  But they are not allowed to carry a firearm if they’re not licensed.

I’m glad we got that passed. Truly. We should’ve let parents take their children hunting without a license anyway, but I still believe that we have more important legislation to work on.

Excessive taxes come to mind.

Combining our state corporate tax rate of 12% with the federal rate of 35% and the Tax Foundation says that the Hawkeye State may have the highest levy in the developed world.

And according to the Wall Street Journal, workers “bear the cost of excessive corporate taxes. A 2009 study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City examined three decades of data on business taxes and worker paychecks. The study found that “corporate taxes reduce wages and that the magnitude of the negative relationship between the taxes and the wages has increased over the past 30 years.”

Businesses in high tax states invest less, the study found, and this leads to lower productivity (think fewer jobs) and eventually lower average pay for workers.

This isn’t just hypothetical theory. This is state government stifling businesses that could and would be creating jobs if the tax and business climate were less oppressive.

It’s plain and simple math folks. It’s not sustainable unless we change the path we’re on.

This is why I expect we’ll start to see half-truths and attempts to claim public credit for easing restrictions and burdens on Iowa taxpayers to start coming out of the liberal leadership in the next few weeks. They know, as well as you and I do, that they have to start gaining the appearance of being business and taxpayer friendly if they want to hold on to the majority in the Iowa Senate in 2012.

But you and I know such efforts will be seen for what it really is: political grandstanding. If they cared about taxpayers, and if they cared about Iowa workers and the middle class, they wouldn’t have been so deceptive with their legislation and rhetoric for the last several years.

And if they had truly realized the “error of their ways,” they would’ve immediately reached across the aisle and united with conservatives to ease restrictions, ease the burdens and get us back on track sooner rather than later.

Taxpayers remain last on their agenda.

Sincerely,

Senator Kent Sorenson

Only days into the legislative session, the Iowa House of Representatives passed HF 45, also known as the Taxpayers First Act.

The Taxpayers First Act would provide savings of over $500 million to the state over three fiscal years and would:

•        Create a new Tax Relief Fund (TRF) to capture the general fund surplus. It directed the Ways and Means Committees of the Legislature to establish the tax relief policy.

•        Require the Executive, Judicial and Legislative branches to establish an employee premium for health insurance coverage, sets the premium at a minimum of $100 per month. It asks the State employee organizations to renegotiate current bargained contracts to achieve cost savings for health insurance coverage. (Estimated maximum savings – $66.4 million!)

•        Reduce expenditures for office supplies, outside services, equipment purchases, information technology, printing and binding and marketing by 50 percent of the unencumbered appropriation. (Estimated savings – $30.4 million!)

•        Deny any state benefits to illegal aliens unless already covered by federal law. (Estimated savings – unknown!)

•        Prohibit State agencies from employing taxpayer-funded lobbyist. (Estimated savings – $2.4 million!)

•        Prohibit the State from purchasing new general use vehicles through the end of FY 2011.

•        Require the Iowa Telecommunications and Technology Commission to develop a Request for Proposal to sell or lease the Iowa Communications Network. (Fiscal impact – unknown)

•        Reduce funding for information technology purchases by 50 percent and requires the executive branch to combine information technology systems. (Estimated savings – $1 million)

•        Prohibit the Department of Natural Resources from purchasing more land. Does allow land to be donated to the DNR. (Estimated savings – $3.1 million)

A lot of these were good ole’ common sense measures.

And considering that the people of Iowa spoke pretty clearly back in November about what they wanted their new legislature to do, I thought that the powers that be in the Iowa Senate would at least give the appearance of listening to the people they serve!

How wrong I was.

Thursday afternoon saw us finally debating a bill (Taxpayers First Act) that would’ve done exactly what’s needed, which is putting money back into the pockets of small business owners, back into the coffers of taxpayers and getting Iowa back onto the road of recovery.

But it was just business as usual.

Senate liberals, at the bidding of their liberal Majority Leader Mike Gronstal, proceeded to gut the bill of many of the substantive measures intended to turn our state around, wielding their powerful majority around like a club to beat down Iowa taxpayers.

And, because they saw fit to change the rules right out of the gate when the session first started, I was powerless to do anything about it but vote against every single one of their amendments.

But that doesn’t mean that they’re held unaccountable.

Because we made sure that every single vote, for every single amendment which they attacked the taxpayer, was a record roll call vote.

That means that they weren’t allowed just to voice their vote in hopes of denying down the road during the election season, rather, they had to put down essentially in writing, for all the world to see, that they didn’t care what the voter wanted, that they think they know better than Iowans who actually RUN businesses and who actually WORK to pay their taxes, and that they think they know better.

What a travesty in justice.

Gronstal is still stalling. (Gronstalling)

Stay tuned for further updates, and again, it’s an honor to be your Senator.

Sincerely,

Senator Kent Sorenson

The Economics of Stalling

Year after year, Iowa ranks as one of the least friendly states in the nation to conduct business in, according to the Small Business Survival Index.  While Iowa’s business climate seemed to improve in 2010, Iowa still ranked at the very low end of the list.  Only nine other states and the District of Columbia were found to have a worse business climate.

And while Iowa scores some points for having a low number of health insurance mandates (6th lowest), low crime rate (10th), low electric utility costs (11th), and low gas tax rate (18th), Iowa doesn’t fare so well when it comes to corporate income tax rates, corporate capital gains tax rates, and adjusted unemployment tax rates.

Iowa ranks 49th for corporate income tax rates and 49th for corporate capital gains tax rates.  Only the District of Columbia and the state of Pennsylvania have higher rates!

In figuring adjusted unemployment taxes, the index takes the maximum state tax rate and applies it to the state wage base and then takes that as a share of state average pay.  In this category, Iowa ranks 48th, beating out only Minnesota, Utah, and North Dakota.

The reason I bring up all this dismal data is to tell you again what I told you in my campaign – I won’t vote for new taxes, and I know that improving Iowa’s business climate is crucial to attracting and growing businesses in this state and putting Iowans back to work.

But one man in the senate won’t let us do that.

You see, Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal has the power of controlling the committees that new legislation must go through. As such, he can either have a committee kill that legislation or bring it to the floor for a vote. There are a lot of good bills that have been introduced this session that are aimed directly at getting Iowa back on track.

But Gronstal stalls.

And he can do it, too. You know why? Because he decided right after the start of the legislative session that he’d change the 40 year old senate rules to remove the language that allows a senator like me to force legislation to the floor.

I bet you can imagine how I feel about that.

I call it tyranny, plain and simple.

Improving Iowa’s business climate is crucial to attracting and growing businesses in the state and putting Iowans back to work.  I remain dedicated to helping reform our tax structure and identifying and removing unnecessary government rules and regulations to improve Iowa’s business climate and begin putting Iowans back to work.

If Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal doesn’t like what you have to say, he can stop it dead in its tracks.

So stay tuned for further updates. Our jobs and our economy are at the top of the list in everyone’s minds right now, and I pledge to remain steadfast in my stance on these issues.

As I’ve said before, I’m honored to be your Senator.

Sincerely,

Senator Kent Sorenson

STRAIGHT TALK by Representative Kent Sorenson

August 30, 2010

Final Veterans Mental Health Task Force Report

The Iowa Veterans Mental Health Task Force issued its final report last week.

The final report included 9 recommendations, three of which will likely require legislative action.

Recommendation: Enhance the existing veteran’s database by capturing veteran’s information through existing state data collection systems. Identifying veterans across the state has proven to be a barrier to providing full support to Iowa’s veterans. Coming up with a way to maintain an accurate database of veterans in the state will help officials provide outreach by getting out current information as it relates to veterans benefits.

Recommendation: Initiate process to create a jail diversion program for veterans in Iowa. With rates of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Traumatic Brain Injury  (TBI) being high in soldiers returning to civilian life after tours of duty, some are finding themselves in the jail system due to their mental health conditions.  Jail diversion programs are becoming increasingly implemented across the United States, with studies showing lower rates of recidivism.  Federal money is available for such programs through Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and a pilot program could be established without legislative action.

Recommendation: Establish a state fee basis program for behavioral health services to serve veterans in their local communities. Veterans in Iowa often face the challenge of distance and location when they need access to mental health services, especially in rural areas.  Adding to this problem, rural areas in Iowa are facing a shortage of mental health professionals.   A state fee basis program would allow veterans to use their VA benefits to access a local behavioral health provider of their choice.  This would give veterans much greater access to help in their local communities without requiring those who are elderly or disabled to travel great distances.

Other Recommendations: Other recommendations in the report include providing mental health first aid training to first responders and veteran stakeholder groups so they will be aware of what to watch for in situations dealing with veterans; developing an outreach strategy and social marketing campaign to promote awareness of mental health issues veterans may be facing; encouraging law enforcement training to include crisis intervention training especially focusing on veteran issues; creating a community based peer support pilot program for veterans and their families; securing a mobile outreach vehicle to help bring information and support to Iowa’s veterans in both rural and urban areas; and developing a veterans screening process that will enable non-VA service providers a framework to reference in identifying and appropriately referring veterans with mental health issues. The full report can be read at:  http://www.iowahouserepublicans.com/wp-content/uploads/Veterans-Final-Report-2010-7-22.pdf

Please feel free to contact me if you have any issues or concerns you would like to discuss.

Representative Kent Sorenson

515-962-2192

Kent@kentsorenson.com

Representative Kent Sorenson of Indianola,  has been named a “Friend of Iowa Business” by the Iowa Industry PAC, the political action committee of the Iowa Association of Business and Industry.  Representative Kent Sorenson is seeking election to the Iowa Senate in District 37 that includes all of Warren and Madison counties and four townships in southern Dallas County.

The Iowa Industry PAC evaluates candidates based on their ability to help create jobs in Iowa by supporting a competitive business climate.  Criteria used to make the designations include the candidates’ positions on issues of importance to job creators in Iowa.

“Representative Sorenson has demonstrated a commitment to improve Iowa’s business climate so that employers can create more jobs and grow the economy,” said Michael Ralston, President of the Iowa Association of Business and Industry.

The Iowa Association of Business and Industry (ABI) is comprised of approximately 1,400 companies employing more than 300,000 Iowans. As “The Voice of Iowa Business Since 1903“, ABI works to enhance the Iowa business climate to foster growth and prosperity for Iowans. The Iowa Industry PAC is non-partisan and endorses both Republican and Democratic candidates for legislative offices. The committee encourages voters to consider the endorsements when evaluating which candidates will help bring jobs to Iowa when voting in the November 2^nd general election.