<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Kent Sorenson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kentsorenson.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kentsorenson.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:59:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forbid it, Almighty God! by Anthony Seliquini</title>
		<link>http://kentsorenson.com/forbid-it-almighty-god/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Seliquini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kentsorenson.com/?p=266#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Excellent, Senator. I would support such a bill. Introduce it, and I will do my best to see that it gets passed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent, Senator. I would support such a bill. Introduce it, and I will do my best to see that it gets passed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Business as Usual by Debbie Sundeen</title>
		<link>http://kentsorenson.com/business-as-usual/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Sundeen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 20:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kentsorenson.com/?p=235#comment-108</guid>
		<description>This is a the first step in recording every act that this Senate does, along with redistricting I hope this eliminates those who recklessly spend, inadverdently excuse themselves from their constituents who clearly sent a message last November&gt; Thank you Kent for providing us with information, it will help us clear the debris next time around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a the first step in recording every act that this Senate does, along with redistricting I hope this eliminates those who recklessly spend, inadverdently excuse themselves from their constituents who clearly sent a message last November&gt; Thank you Kent for providing us with information, it will help us clear the debris next time around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Business as Usual by Anthony Seliquini</title>
		<link>http://kentsorenson.com/business-as-usual/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Seliquini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 02:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kentsorenson.com/?p=235#comment-107</guid>
		<description>While you are a member of Congress, I meant to address you properly: Senator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While you are a member of Congress, I meant to address you properly: Senator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Business as Usual by Anthony Seliquini</title>
		<link>http://kentsorenson.com/business-as-usual/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Seliquini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 02:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kentsorenson.com/?p=235#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Way to go, Congressman! You are the man. And thank you, for being stalwart in your sensible, Constitutional ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go, Congressman! You are the man. And thank you, for being stalwart in your sensible, Constitutional ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Economics of Stalling by Steven McCoy</title>
		<link>http://kentsorenson.com/the-economics-of-stalling/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven McCoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kentsorenson.com/?p=228#comment-102</guid>
		<description>An Open Letter to State Senator Gronstal

from citizen McCoy

Senator Mike Gronstal,

Article 1. Section 2. of the Iowa Constitution says, “All political power is inherent in the PEOPLE. Government
is instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the PEOPLE, and they have the right, at all
times, to alter or reform the same, whenever the public good may require it.”

What part of Article 1. Section 2, do you not understand? You obviously do not comprehend that the electorate,
your employers, are sick and tired of politics as usual. They made their statement in 2008 and after being
duped have risen up once again in 2010 to restate their point.

The politics of the past is what the people are sick of. They are sick of party politics and the arrogance of their
employees. You have either forgotten, or did not know, or you are ignoring why we hired you. Regardless it’s
time for a refresher course. You were hired to represent the PEOPLE of this great state, and not to fulfil your
own particular agenda, the agenda of a special interest group or to feed your ego. Through your myopic view
you have convinced yourself that you are doing what is right. Denial is not a river in Egypt.

It is understandable and reasonable for the Senate and the House to adopt rules to provide for the expediting
of the workings of those two bodies. However; something is drastically wrong when those rules, made by the
employees, take priority over the employers and the constitution that the employees swore to uphold. Your
excuse that these are the same rules that Republicans adopted indicates you don’t get it. The people are sick
of non constitutional rules hindering the implementation of the constitution., whether the Republicans or the
Democrats adopted them. This is the party politics we are sick of. As a party you may express your difference
in ideology and you rightly should debate those ideologies, for they represent your constituency. However,
when you become so wrapped up in your party’s ideology or some special interest group’s ideology, you have
missed the point that you are representing the PEOPLE of Iowa. We the PEOPLE, your employers, gave you your job and we will fire you and every other employee who is on their own power trip and have disregarded their employer.

In your defense, I agree that the constitution is for the protection, security and rights of the people and to
avoid the tyranny of the majority, as you previously quoted in the Des Moines Register on January ninth. This
is why we are a Republic and not a Democracy. The constitution, however, does not provide rights and privileges for behavior because rights are granted by the creator as stated in the moral law of our nation, the
Declaration of Independence; “We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, that
they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these is Life, Liberty, and
the pursuit of happiness (right of property). That to SECURE these (Creator given) rights, Governments are
instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” Governments have no
authority to grant rights. They have the responsibility and only the power the PEOPLE grant them.

There is no homosexual gene in the DNA code of man, so the scientific evidence reveals that homosexuality is
a behavior. You are correct when you state peoples rights should not be put to a vote; however, rights are not
the issue. Behavior is. So your whole premise of protecting the rights of a special interest group who struggles
with their own identity, is erroneous and reflects either your refusal to consider the scientific evidence of the
International Human Genome Consortium or it reflects your biases toward homosexuals.

You may remain full of self pride, and may even persuade some of your fellow Democrats to join you in being
an obstructionist, or you can decide to start serving the PEOPLE of Iowa. Your choice and your fellow employees’ choices on this issue and on other issues that will be presented to you during this session will determine how long you will be employed. The PEOPLE, your employer, will no longer put up with the petty, bickering, partisan politics of the past. It is yours and other politicians self-aggrandizement that has lead to the decline of this great nation and state.

In conclusion let me remind you of Article 1. Section 2. of the Iowa Constitution says, “All political power is
inherent in the PEOPLE. Government is instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the PEOPLE,
and they have the right, at all times, to alter or reform the same, whenever the public good may require it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Open Letter to State Senator Gronstal</p>
<p>from citizen McCoy</p>
<p>Senator Mike Gronstal,</p>
<p>Article 1. Section 2. of the Iowa Constitution says, “All political power is inherent in the PEOPLE. Government<br />
is instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the PEOPLE, and they have the right, at all<br />
times, to alter or reform the same, whenever the public good may require it.”</p>
<p>What part of Article 1. Section 2, do you not understand? You obviously do not comprehend that the electorate,<br />
your employers, are sick and tired of politics as usual. They made their statement in 2008 and after being<br />
duped have risen up once again in 2010 to restate their point.</p>
<p>The politics of the past is what the people are sick of. They are sick of party politics and the arrogance of their<br />
employees. You have either forgotten, or did not know, or you are ignoring why we hired you. Regardless it’s<br />
time for a refresher course. You were hired to represent the PEOPLE of this great state, and not to fulfil your<br />
own particular agenda, the agenda of a special interest group or to feed your ego. Through your myopic view<br />
you have convinced yourself that you are doing what is right. Denial is not a river in Egypt.</p>
<p>It is understandable and reasonable for the Senate and the House to adopt rules to provide for the expediting<br />
of the workings of those two bodies. However; something is drastically wrong when those rules, made by the<br />
employees, take priority over the employers and the constitution that the employees swore to uphold. Your<br />
excuse that these are the same rules that Republicans adopted indicates you don’t get it. The people are sick<br />
of non constitutional rules hindering the implementation of the constitution., whether the Republicans or the<br />
Democrats adopted them. This is the party politics we are sick of. As a party you may express your difference<br />
in ideology and you rightly should debate those ideologies, for they represent your constituency. However,<br />
when you become so wrapped up in your party’s ideology or some special interest group’s ideology, you have<br />
missed the point that you are representing the PEOPLE of Iowa. We the PEOPLE, your employers, gave you your job and we will fire you and every other employee who is on their own power trip and have disregarded their employer.</p>
<p>In your defense, I agree that the constitution is for the protection, security and rights of the people and to<br />
avoid the tyranny of the majority, as you previously quoted in the Des Moines Register on January ninth. This<br />
is why we are a Republic and not a Democracy. The constitution, however, does not provide rights and privileges for behavior because rights are granted by the creator as stated in the moral law of our nation, the<br />
Declaration of Independence; “We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, that<br />
they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these is Life, Liberty, and<br />
the pursuit of happiness (right of property). That to SECURE these (Creator given) rights, Governments are<br />
instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” Governments have no<br />
authority to grant rights. They have the responsibility and only the power the PEOPLE grant them.</p>
<p>There is no homosexual gene in the DNA code of man, so the scientific evidence reveals that homosexuality is<br />
a behavior. You are correct when you state peoples rights should not be put to a vote; however, rights are not<br />
the issue. Behavior is. So your whole premise of protecting the rights of a special interest group who struggles<br />
with their own identity, is erroneous and reflects either your refusal to consider the scientific evidence of the<br />
International Human Genome Consortium or it reflects your biases toward homosexuals.</p>
<p>You may remain full of self pride, and may even persuade some of your fellow Democrats to join you in being<br />
an obstructionist, or you can decide to start serving the PEOPLE of Iowa. Your choice and your fellow employees’ choices on this issue and on other issues that will be presented to you during this session will determine how long you will be employed. The PEOPLE, your employer, will no longer put up with the petty, bickering, partisan politics of the past. It is yours and other politicians self-aggrandizement that has lead to the decline of this great nation and state.</p>
<p>In conclusion let me remind you of Article 1. Section 2. of the Iowa Constitution says, “All political power is<br />
inherent in the PEOPLE. Government is instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the PEOPLE,<br />
and they have the right, at all times, to alter or reform the same, whenever the public good may require it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let&#8217;s Put Kids Ahead Of Special Interest by kurt lickiss</title>
		<link>http://kentsorenson.com/lets-put-kids-ahead-of-special-interest/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>kurt lickiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 05:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kentsorenson.com/?p=188#comment-45</guid>
		<description>It would be hard to find anyone who doesn&#039;t more or less agree with what you are saying here.  We need good teachers, we should pay good teachers well.  However, how many good teachers have we turned away?  Do we have a surplus of better teachers that go unhired? If we paid more would we really attract better teachers, or would we just be spending more for the same teachers?  I wonder if this isn&#039;t a bit like the texting while driving &quot;law,&quot;  we don&#039;t need more well intentioned legislation, we need parents to take part in the process and demand action from their school boards.  Just like so many areas of my life, I don&#039;t need the &quot;10 pound heads&quot; in Washington or DesMoines to run my life, but I do need to be awake at the wheel.  Before we rush to pass more laws, let&#039;s make sure we know our students, teachers and administrators, both appointed and elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be hard to find anyone who doesn&#8217;t more or less agree with what you are saying here.  We need good teachers, we should pay good teachers well.  However, how many good teachers have we turned away?  Do we have a surplus of better teachers that go unhired? If we paid more would we really attract better teachers, or would we just be spending more for the same teachers?  I wonder if this isn&#8217;t a bit like the texting while driving &#8220;law,&#8221;  we don&#8217;t need more well intentioned legislation, we need parents to take part in the process and demand action from their school boards.  Just like so many areas of my life, I don&#8217;t need the &#8220;10 pound heads&#8221; in Washington or DesMoines to run my life, but I do need to be awake at the wheel.  Before we rush to pass more laws, let&#8217;s make sure we know our students, teachers and administrators, both appointed and elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Press Release by iCareeGuns</title>
		<link>http://kentsorenson.com/press-release/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>iCareeGuns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 23:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kentsorenson.com/?p=185#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Thanks for having the guts and integrity to initiaite this, Kent. I will do anything to help you. if you need Tancredo&#039;s support, tell me and I will get ahold of him!  He can help with this. 
GREAT JOB in sticking up for Iowans and America!
Ban Illegal Aliens..... not guns!


Caree</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for having the guts and integrity to initiaite this, Kent. I will do anything to help you. if you need Tancredo&#8217;s support, tell me and I will get ahold of him!  He can help with this.<br />
GREAT JOB in sticking up for Iowans and America!<br />
Ban Illegal Aliens&#8230;.. not guns!</p>
<p>Caree</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Press Release by Frank Coll</title>
		<link>http://kentsorenson.com/press-release/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Coll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 02:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kentsorenson.com/?p=185#comment-42</guid>
		<description>The only way to stop all this crap is to do what Rush suggested yesterday.  You have to prove who you are for everything except voting.  We need legislation that requires ID prior to being able to vote in general elections.  This will stop Acorn and their subsidiarity from being able to bus people in from out of state or even different precints</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only way to stop all this crap is to do what Rush suggested yesterday.  You have to prove who you are for everything except voting.  We need legislation that requires ID prior to being able to vote in general elections.  This will stop Acorn and their subsidiarity from being able to bus people in from out of state or even different precints</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kent Sorenson Announces Bid for the Iowa Senate by Kent Sorenson</title>
		<link>http://kentsorenson.com/kent-sorenson-announces-bid-for-the-iowa-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Sorenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kentsorenson.com/?p=86#comment-33</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m on twitter http://twitter.com/KentSorenson Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m on twitter <a href="http://twitter.com/KentSorenson" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/KentSorenson</a> Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kent Sorenson Announces Bid for the Iowa Senate by Paul Comer</title>
		<link>http://kentsorenson.com/kent-sorenson-announces-bid-for-the-iowa-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Comer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 03:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kentsorenson.com/?p=86#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Looked for you on Twitter. Surprised I could not find you. Good Luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looked for you on Twitter. Surprised I could not find you. Good Luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

